This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
0:20 All right. Sh say good morning. Good morning. Let us begin begin by thanking all of our sponsors for this morning cheer to thank our sponsors for the month of Tamos Habalva Yon for dedicating all the shel this month as for Elzar Ben Alisha Daniel for sponsoring all the Josh this month 0:43 for the third yard site velo yea who will be sponsors for today Sarah Steinberg in and for an ultimate shale as father Ben Davis in memory of it's beautiful 1:10 and it's beautiful who in very different ways took the small institutions of their fathers and created global institutions of Torah It's beautiful. Yehuda and Walter Maztov uncompleted. Wow. Completing a full dafomi cycle with our Yehuda here. Oh my gosh. Wow. Yehuda Walter Mazleto. I 1:33 guess this is Sim Simas. Oh my gosh. Incredible. Right. Come in. Okay. Incredible. Incredible. and Bar may and Reno Duben in memory of the holy benit on the occasion of his 32nd yard site known as gimmel tamos his here in all right this dedication is like it looks 1:57 like a goa this is beautiful this is beautiful his work continues to live on and the increased spread of bringing Torah mitz to all Jews around the world may the light generated by his holiness teachings continue to inspire Jews everywhere to increase in their Torah mitzvah meriting the gula speedily in our days. Amen. Amen. Beautiful. 2:19 Beautiful. I say wow. Very inspir the the sponsorships were so incredibly inspirational. Incredible. Incredible. All right. Well, say with that, let us begin. Of course, we dedicate the learning of our brothers and sisters and may our learning be as for them. May our holy souls be successful. 2:40 And beautiful, beautiful dedication. Also with that, let us begin today's but you would have absolutely no idea that that is the case considering where we are starting. Today we are beginning on days 48b. 2:57 Let's pick up with Let's pick up with which is which is 2 4 6 8 10 12 lines up 12 sorry 12 lines down from the top 12 sorry but it's okay also I want to give a very special thank you to one of our straw listeners Dr. Anthony Bren who is a pulmonologist. A pulmonologist 3:28 right who introduced to who who actually told me that he is a boardcertified lungal specialist and he gave me rash to use the word lungal. He gave me rash. 3:45 He says, "As a boardcertified lungal specialist, I am really loving the uptake and adoption of lungal." So again medical community, you're welcome. You're welcome. We're contributing much to the world. So I want to thank Dr. Bashem for his uh for his participation this year for that really made me feel good. Anyway, we already [clears throat] say as follows. 4:05 Remember again yesterday we left off we left off with a very interesting case which is you go ahead and you find you find a needle inside of the lung. So we had a fundamental case is what is the status of that animal? Is it animal the tra? We were trying to figure out what's the nature of the as we're up to right now. 4:23 says, "Here's what is said. This is going to be what's fascinating. Whether or not that needle makes the animal a tra is going to fundamentally depend on how did the needle get there." So the first opinion says that how did it get there? It came through the trachea. If you take a look at Rashi, Rashi says Rashy's right 4:47 across So the easiest way most straightforward way is that the needle went down the trachea from the trachea went down into the bronchi and from the bronchi got a device somehow went into the actual lungs themselves rest of the lungs themselves and therefore again So again, so here's the issue of see even though normally again that wouldn't be the normal way that that the animal would ingest something at the end of the 5:28 day says look at the messas the messas is you have a needle in the lung and there's no exterior perforation. So because there's no exterior perforation the most logical way to say this would be that it came ultimately again through the trachea. Now again, now remember therefore the animal's going to be kosher. Why is the animal going to be kasher? Because remember in order for the lung to go ahead and be in order for 5:51 the animal to be a tra has to occur the interior and exterior membranes have to be pierced in this perforated in this case they're not and therefore the animal will be okay. The other opinion says the other opinion say so their opinion says no this needle came down the esophagus that's what happened over here so the says 6:28 so the the other opinion says no it doesn't make sense it makes more sense to say that the needle came down the esophagic It went from the esophagus. It went into the into the well well we're going to be matis went into the intestines. It perforated out of the intestines. Now by the way we have not spoken about the intestines yet in terms of tra by intestines. We'll get to that. It came out of the intestines and ultimately again must have come into the lungs from 6:52 outside the lungs in which means that by definition what occurred the lungs are perforated. Lungs are perforated. So that's our fundamental makus. That's our fundamental makus. What is the most shy explanation about how this needle got in there? So again, if it came down the trachea into the bronchi into the lungs, then the animal's not going to be a traa. The animal's going to be totally fine because there's no perforation. If 7:15 it came down the esophagus into the intestines, perforates the intestines, then comes into the lungs, the animal's going to be a traa. Incredible. So tells the story. There was once a story of a needle which was found in a section of the lungs. Now this is very important says the lung was already cut up. This is going to be a very important piece of 7:42 the story. It's the lung wasn't told was already cut up and they found a needle in one of the pieces. So the says what happened. So they brought the lung before and ultimately wanted to say that it's kasha. So over here was of the opinion that this needle came in from the trachea right from the trachea to the bronchi to the lungs and 8:13 we one more piece of information we already established in yesterday's death that when something is deficient on the inside that deficiency is notically problematic. So therefore wanted to say that the animal is I'm sorry wanted to say that the animal is one second said that if the lung was perforated or it's deficient what what 8:40 does it mean that that it's missing if it's a deficiency on the outside that's the case of perforation rather again what are we talking about it must be some type of interior deficiency and therefore And I will say again, what do you see from here? That an interior when it's missing something in the interior deficiency is problematic. And again, I will say understand if you find a needle 9:05 inside of the lungs by definition, what does that mean? It there's got to have been some type of lungal impact on that. Right? In other words, you can't have a needle rattling around in there without something happen. There must have been some. So therefore again is saying over here you see that says okay so fine so they they left it 9:28 there. So remember Rabi Rabi wanted to Rabi wanted to say that it was kasher but raised this kasha. So what did they do? They took the lung they took it also wanted to say that it's kasha. Why? Because all of these people are of the same opinion. Namely that the way to explain the presence of the needle was again tracheo bronchi lungs 9:57 right interior deficiency is not considered to be a deficiency and therefore it's fine. So once again but is the one who has a problem with this because fundamentally disagrees. He holds so they call once again the Mishna says if the lung was perforated or it's missing part of it what does it mean it's missing part of it if you say it's on the outside that's 10:26 the case of perforation rather it must be talking about on the inside and therefore the lung the animal should be a tra so So therefore this is incredible took the lung back. So they sent it back to now first wide line. So ultimately again and now at this point he made it a traa. He made it a traa. 10:51 Okay. So the so the says that's that's the that's that's the top of those to which responded he ultimately said so it's interesting said they went ahead and they declared it to be based on their reasoning. Now what does that mean? If you look at Rashi the end of the first wide line 11:24 says so said that's because remember how did this discussion start right you found a lung sorry you found a needle in the lung but what part of the lung did you have what did you have the whole lung which means they were able to see there was no perforation so if there is is no exterior perforation Then logic would dictate it came through 11:53 the trachea bronchi lungs and therefore it's kasheria says sorry rabbi ami says we don't have a whole lung what do we have what do we have we have a piece of lung we have a piece of lung therefore so because we only have a piece of lung therefore at the end of the day we don't know in other words maybe there was a perforation another piece of lung right now all I know is that I have a needle inside of a lung granted there's no 12:20 perforation right over here. But that doesn't mean there's not something in the rest of the lung. Incredible says ultimately again maybe if the whole lung was here we would have found the perforation to wishing. 12:35 So the reason the reason why we're going to declare this animal a tra is because the whole lung is not here which tells us then that if the whole lung was here with a needle inside of it and we could not find the perforation then ultimately again it would can be considered to be said but himself said that if ultimately again if one of the bronchial tubes was 13:05 perforated. The animal is a traa. To which the Gimar answers, isn't that a problem? Isn't that by definition there must have been? In other words, so we've been operating this entire time that what makes a lung what makes the lung or what makes the animal to a chafa is if the lung is perforated. Specifically again the interior and exterior membranes. There is another opinion that says Makman says 13:29 that if the bronchial tube is is perforated that also makes it a tra if the needles coming through there we have to say that it was perforated to which the says that was actually mentioned in a very specific case which we'll talk about in a little while third wide line sorry fourth wide line end of the linear 13:57 That's actually talking about again where one of the bronchial tubes was perforated and ended up attaching itself to another one of the tubes. That's actually where there's going to be a tra situation. Okay, we're going to come back to that. Hi. We learned that this is actually interesting case. Again, we haven't touched on the intestines yet, but we'll get to it. That if the intestines were perforated, let's there was an 14:28 intestinal perforation. And the way to remember again, the intestines are coiled as we will discuss. Let's say the perforation on one coil ended up just being against a second layer. So, it was closed up. The the the perforation was closed up ultimately again by resting against another part of the coil. So, the Gimra says mag protects it. it protects it says so why wouldn't the 14:51 same thing apply to bronchial perforation as well second do not do not compare cases of tra in other words suggesting say remember we'll see this that if the bronchial tube there is an opinion that says that if the bronchial tube is if the if one of the bronchial tubes is perforated then ultimately it's a traa and even if it's resting even if the perforation is closed off because it's 15:14 resting on another tube it's still a traa says one second what about the case of a perforated intestine where if it's let's say let's just call it coil coil layer one is perforated but the perforation is closed off because it's resting against coil layer two then that's kusher so if it works by intestines it should work by bronchial tubes to which the says what are you talking about you can't compare traus 15:39 right I was saying that that becomes clear you can't compare one case of traus to another case of traus can't say by this is like this because we see this right this is such like a delicate science you could have a perforation over here and it's meaningless and a perforation over here and the animal is as good as dead so therefore you can't compare cases so say there was there was a there was a needle that was found in the primary 16:12 bronchial tube in in in the lungs. So, we'll say I put out again on the Dafomi chat uh yesterday. It was like actually yesterday afternoon just two just two more pictures that are actually old pictures. One of them is just the lung just I'm sorry they're not as graphic as Mishi's pictures but uh right but these are suitable for family for children of all ages as well. So again I say so if you take a look it's just a picture of 16:36 the lung ju just to see what we're talking about over here right so if you take a look at it so again you have the gray which is the trachea and the green and if you notice how how the bronchial tubes work is there's the primary bronchi which are like the major the major branches off the trachea and then what we call the symphonos the symphonos are the other bronchial tubes that branch off that's the yellow that's the 16:59 yellow in this image okay so the says as follows So there was a there was an animal where they found a needle in what we call the primary bronchi. Okay. In the in the image that I sent you that's the green ultimately again sorry. 17:25 So they brought them. So they brought it before the was a place. So ultimately again they went ahead and they brought it before the group of who previously declared the animal aer. But in this case over here the rabbis did not rule or hater. Why not? says ultimately again they did not go ahead and 17:57 establish it establish it as based on their previous rulings they also did not go ahead and say that it's right so they couldn't say that it's because they previously ruled that it was a tra right but in this case they also could not say that it was conclusively asser why not we'll say Why not? Because this is a unique case. 18:22 What's the case over here? You're finding it in the primary bronchi. You'd be very hardressed to say in that case that it came down the esophagus into the intestines, perforated the intestines, came into the lung, and then lodged itself dafa in the primary bronchi. The fact that it's there would just seem to lend much more credence to the fact that it came down the tracheo into the primary bronchi. So therefore again even 18:46 [clears throat] though these same were the ones who said before that when you find a needle inside of the lungs or we normally automatically declare it a tra this case is a little bit different another needle case now we're transitioning a little bit there was a there was a needle that was found in a section of the liver piece of the liver 19:13 wanted to say the animal is a So understand if you find if you an animal and you find a needle in its flesh is the animal the answer is no. So we'll say so he's comparing he's comparing the liver to the flesh which makes a lot of sense because remember again liver perforation or perforation of the liver doesn't make animal what makes animal liver what makes right if if if there's nothing left of the liver 19:42 how much of liver do you need left the kazu point over here is the only thing that pretty much makes a liver a traa is gone it's gone so why I don't understand why why would a needle in the liver make any difference says like this is very very interesting. 20:03 So we look like this. Where is the eye of the needle? Where where where exactly is the eye of the needle facing? If the eye of the needle ultimately again is outside is facing outside, right? So the sharp part the sharp part of the needle is resting in the liver. So the says Okay. So, this is very interesting. So, essentially what we look at is like this. Where did the needle come from? 20:32 Did the needle come from inside the liver or outside the liver? If the needle came from from outside the liver, then fine. But if the needle came from inside the liver, we are that maybe it came ultimately again by some circuitous roots via the lungs. In which case, again, we have an issue. We have an issue ultimately again of a needle that may have passed through the lungs and 20:54 therefore a potential traer area. And all of this ultimately again is only matters with what we call a thicker needle. But if it is a thinner needle then ultimately again we are not concerned at all. says 49os I. So why is this any different than a needle that is found ultimately again in the bases like I get about say this is 21:30 the second image that I just put on the on the chat just it's just the stomachs besos basos is one of the stomachs of the animal what they what what they call the reticulum why is this any different ultimately again than finding a needle inside of the basakos the says in where again there say it's all about is did the needle only puncture one side 21:54 or did the needle puncture would the needle go totally through? Right? If it just punctured on one side, the animal is kasha. If it punctured on both sides, ultimately it's going to be a trapo and there say we make no distinction. Where's the head of the needle? In other words, we'll say by the liver the sounds like it's saying do we or do we assume that the needle penetrated the liver from the outside in which case again we're fine or did it puncture from the 22:21 inside which case you have to be there travel through the lungs yet by in the case of the stomach of the animal there's no such like that we don't make a distinction about whether where where the eye of the needle is facing so the says So say here's the difference in the stomach in the stomach. It always makes more sense ultimately again to say that it came from the inside out because 22:48 there makes sense that the needle would be pushed out because since there's food in the stomach there's a force acting on the needle pushing it out in the liver there's no force inside of the liver pushing the needle out. Therefore again we really don't know really don't know. Therefore we have to see where the eye of the needle is situated. Incredible. 23:10 This is an interesting case. So there was over here there was a there was once a needle that was found with pisa in the large vessel large blood vessel of the of the liver said that it's says that it's kasher. 23:33 They came and they brought and they asked. So listen to this. So Ravina said seize the cloak of the one who declared this animal a tra which means that Ravina felt that this was an inappropriate inappropriate right that ultimately again this animal was not a traa at all. This animal should have been totally kosher and 23:58 therefore the person who declared it a ultimately deprived the owner of his money. Stole from not not stole but deprived him of his money. Therefore he said cease his cloak in order to go ahead and pay back the owner. Good. Another story ultimately again the says if you look at Rashi Rashi says because by declaring it a tra remember again what do you what do you do with a 24:26 tra animal? You feed it to your dogs. So he calls them a laws seize his cloak and go ahead and use it to pay back the agrieved party. So the tells a story now they once went ahead and found they found a date pit a date pit right in the side of the gallbladder. Okay. 24:52 When I was in the khana they said how did a date pit wind up in the gallbladder? It must have come through this component. Must have come through the bronchial tubes. Must come somehow come through the lungs. And even though again even though a date pit would seem to be too small, too too large to travel down these passageways, gravity works in interesting ways that 25:42 the since the animal keeps walking and the animal keeps moving little by little. That's what it means. She said look at through movement that the animal keeps moving a little right each day. So the pit continues to move and ultimately wedges itself in this very narrow area. 26:08 So the seems to indicate over here that through continued movement small movement and daily movement and gravity the pit is able to go ahead and wedge itself in the gallbladder. Also I just point out what a tremendous and beautiful muska that this rashi is. Sometimes in life it feels impossible to move things from point A to point B. How do you do it? Rashi gives us the formula. 26:36 Through a little bit of sustained movement over a prolonged amount of time. A little bit of sustain, right? A little bit of a little bit of movement over a prolonged sustained amount of time creates results. Spiritual growth does not require heroic activity. Spiritual growth does not require major change. 27:04 But sometimes [clears throat] all spiritual growth needs is choose something and stick to it. Don't give it up day after day. No excuses. Show up. continue to walk, continue to do, and if you do that day after day, Rashi says, you'll ultimately see the results. Not a bait in the gallbladder, but I'm saying but you you'll you'll see the spiritual beautiful comprehensive results. 27:26 Incredible. All of this is talking about the the the pit of a of a of a date. Apparently, olive pits are sharper and olive pits ultimately again would perforate. Okay. tells says as follows. 27:46 Why are the lungs called? So apparently the lungs are very healthy, right? Have have also good medicinal medicinal purposes. So apparently eating lungs was good for eyesight, right? So Lero like so apparently again therefore lungs got lungs got the name from they illuminate the eyes. Incredible. So 28:09 the says, "Okay, now that we know this, is that like just straight up like lung tartar?" Like, you know, you just go ahead, you know, you just eat the lungs or you have to season it like like what? Like how how do you unlock the medicinal qualities of lungs? So listen to this. So if you could buy if you could buy a a duck if you could buy a duck for one zuz 28:37 its lungs are worth four z because obviously again given the medicinal qualities of lungs. So again, you know, if even if the duck is worth, the lungs will be worth for now. Again, now if it was just that you eat the lungs straight up, right? In other words, I don't I don't literally mean raw, but it means like unseasoned unseasoned if that's the case. So if I could buy the whole duck for on right or go ahead 29:05 and buy the lungs for four, it's not much of of a sh just buy the whole duck for one and you're good to go. rather it must be none at all. The lungs have to be prepared in a certain way in order to go ahead and unlock the medicinal value of it. Incredible. 29:23 Okay. So, so this is a very interesting case. Let's say you have let's say you have a lung right perforation on the lung but it's perforated on an area where the would have been manipulating the lungs. So, take a look at Rashi over here for just a moment. Rashi's on the second wide line. 29:49 So again, one of the things that has to happen when a shenan inspects the lungs is that the loes are separated and there are some certain like tighter areas in there. So you could have a situation where the sh remember what is the sh looking for? The sh is feeling the lungs because he's looking for circus, right? 30:07 Adhesions adhesions and potential perforations. Well, if he pushes his hand a little bit into a narrower area, what could happen? He himself could end up perforating the lung. So, here's the shila. If you find a per a perforation on the lung on a place where the would have been touching the lung, what's the sha talon? 30:29 Can we attribute the perforation to the right? Can we say it must have been the who caused that perforation or not? is and I will say that is and that is really tremendous if there is a preparation in a place where we know that the handled the lung and there's possibility that the perforation ultimately again was handled by was done by the sh obviously if you find the needle in the lung right and then 30:59 there's a perforation okay you can't but assuming there's nothing else to be told on it and we know that this was an area where the sh handled the lung rashi also points out it's not Like today where Shim used gloves, right? In the good old days. In the good old days, right? Where there was no where there were no gloves. 31:15 Right. Right. Right. Okay. Sorry. Sorry. Right. Some sh use gloves. Right. So say so ultimately actually by the lungs cannot use gloves because you have to be able to feel it. So Rashi points out just understand why this comes up. 31:32 Fingernails, right? A fingernail could perforate a lung. It's a very soft tissue. So you could have the situation where again you could have a perfectly good lung and again the nail perforates it straight up. Right? So therefore again the says that's so if you find the perforation then it's quite possible that it was the who went ahead and did it again. 31:56 We we're told it on the and therefore again it's not a problem. Incredible. Um I'm sorry I just lost sorry. So listen to this the son of say like this. My father My father was one of the heads of the of say remember the we've seen this before the was the gathering 32:26 of like right was the gathering of was the gathering of the different to learn. So says my father was the head of the and he said that when we find the perforation in the area where the handled it we could attribute the perforation to the manipulation ultimately as said it would seem to be 33:01 that that which your father's father said is correct. So we'll say we give a parallel case and now this is actually an interesting case says that we attribute what what does it mean we attribute it to a wolf. So this is interesting. Rashi says over. 33:20 So let's listen to this. Let's say for a moment, right? If there's intestinal perforation that makes an animal a trafa. Let's say you shifted an animal, you left the intestines. A wolf came and took the intestines. And when the wolf comes back, there's two perforations, right? There's a perforation in it. So we attribute the perforation to the wolf. And we don't say oh it must have been or it could have been that the area where the wolf perforated the intestine 33:44 there was already a pre-existing perforation. We don't say that. So what do you see from what do you see point is that when you have the ability to attribute perforations to something else we do it we do it. So too you find the perforation on the lung in an area where the sh's hand would have been moving around. We attribute that to the sh. 34:03 Incredible. So says mna. What's the what's the case of mna? Uh good. So moreashi says over here. So this is interesting. Let's say again there's worms inside of the lungs. 34:18 There's worms inside of the lungs and ultimately again obviously perforated the lungs. It's actually quite interesting. So the the issue the issue over here if you look at again so we'll say here's what's interesting the worm itself right the worm the worms themselves interesting enough do not make the animal a traa what makes the animal a traa the fact that the worms 34:54 permeate uh perforate perforate the lungs that's so what's the shila we now she the animal we open up the animal we find that there are worms that came perforated the lungs what's the shila Do we say that the worms perforated the lungs before the or after the it's not semantics. Why? Because it's before the animals are after the doesn't matter. 35:16 Doesn't matter. So one opinion said ultimately again we say we assume that it came out after came after they both say I know what you're thinking to yourself. I know what you're thinking to yourself. You think to yourself I don't understand. Well not not thinking to yourself why would you eat it? Right? But leaving that leaving that aside goes that's also because we live in a very disposable society. Right? So often right often our mindset is e throw it out and just replace with something 35:51 else. Life wasn't always like that. I remember growing up in the it was not like that. Right? So say something else over here. I know what you're thinking to yourself thinking to yourself, one second. Aren't all of these cases suffic right? Because remember again where do we know from? Who do we know from? 36:08 Right? Which is why by the way was mentioning this to me the other day. Which is why some of these things like sound like a little bit strange like liqufied lungs. You would think to yourself in right is of course again remember doesn't necessarily follow our our our system of logic. They were given by so they're they're like set immutable laws. 36:32 So you might be thinking to yourself in all of these cases don't you have a so you have a perforated lung is an area where the shit's hand may have done it or not. Okay. What are you doing? Or ultimately again the the the the the lungs are wormying. Did the worms come out before after? So say so remember you have something operating here against 36:54 the which is so remember again an animal is in a state of unless we know otherwise that that that's the way it works. So because of that in these cases in these cases where there's a suffic a suffic doesn't upend a concrete evidence upends a is a very strong thing. So because of that in any of these cases 37:18 since you have and you only have a suffic that maybe it's a ends up trumping the potential. Okay. Incredible. So again remember again the Mishna said that the animal is not a traim in the Mishna was seconds right ultimately felt that 37:53 an animal is only a tra not simply with not not with the perforation of the membrane. But rather again once the bronchi are perforated. So say first white line what is this referring to? This is referring to to the primary bronai. So say that that's the image again going back to that image that I showed you. 38:15 Those are the uh what color was it over here? Green on the picture. Yes. So that those are the green tubes the primary bronchi ultimately again in the lungs. So the gimra says And therefore say once the primary bronai are perforated ultimately again the animal is a tra. 38:45 So ultimately again so he answers. So we'll say if you take a look take a look at Rashi. Rashi says over here talking about the one who lives amongst amongst the Arabs ultimately again does not follow. So say came along and he found also that they were saying that we went to the ourselves and told us that does not 39:34 but I heard and the ends ends. I'm sorry. Okay, bottom line take away and therefore again it is as we've been operating up until now that in order for the lung to be a traa interior and exterior exterior white membrane interior med red membrane have to be perforated ultimately again in order for 39:58 the animal to be a traa excellent nikva haka. So I'll say next if the stomach is perforated ultimately that makes the animal a okay remember again just once again referencing that image that I put on the chat so you can see over here that there are multiple multiple stomachs of the animal the ca the ka is the fourth 40:26 stomach so now watch this now we're we're switching gears for just a moment there's something Very interesting. The fat that is on top of the right. So the fat on top of the fourth stomach permitted it say in the wide world of right in the wide world of fat. So ultimately again there is some fat that is user and some 40:53 fat that is and some fat that is motor. So apparently the fat that is on top of the fourth stomach known as the ka ultimately again people were knowing like what say because said in the name of his fathers that ultimately again the fat on top of the ka ultimately is not forbidden fat it's permitted fatim how do you remember 41:18 this kohan the way to remember this is the helps his kohhanic brethren out right that was a coin gave a permissive ruling which benefited his fellow kohanim because now the fat on top of the ka is going to be motor by the way you make it sound like always helping right helping a brother out right he's always he's 41:40 always helping his kohanic brethren out give me an example aware of where was helping his brethren out is very beautiful this is Speak to his son saying this is how you shall bless the Jewish people. Say unto them says the teaches us that bless but who bless? 42:16 Who blesses the kohan? Right? So we know bless. Who blesses the says and I will bless them says so beautiful is I will bless I will bless them the is the says the right ultimately again so you bless 42:51 You bless the Jews and I will bless you says no. So give us like this. is the problem from the seems to indicate that the kohanim blessed the Jewish people but what about no offense we love you guys right but more than I want from you I want from so 43:17 the tells me ultimately again that bless when the says I will bless them the them is not who is the Affirms the blessing. Where does learn? So where did the get their from? 43:52 So this is incredible. So he understands ultimately again that the source of that is by whoever blesses you will be blessed. If you bless other Jews you by definition will be blessed. And therefore who bless other Jews by definition receive divine blessing. So the says uses this ultimately again as an example 44:22 of Bishal always looking out for the kohanim. So how is looking out for the kohhanim? Because goes ahead and places the kohhanic blessing in the same spot so to speak as the blessing for it's all in the same thing. The same way that gets the blessing from kohhaniman ultimately kohanim get the blessing from so that's a very strong limit as opposed to who understands that kohanic blessing 44:47 for themselves comes from a different looking out for his kohhanic brethren he places right next to there's a chain gets from get whoever blesses Jews by definition gets blessed. 45:07 are blessing us. Therefore, by definition, they get blessed to say just just just tremendous tremendously that where come from when you are good to other Jews who is good to you when you give to other Jews gives braha to you, right? Everybody's looking for schools. Everybody's looking for different ways ultimately again to go ahead and find braha in their lives 45:31 and there's a simple way to do things. be good to your fellow Jew and that ultimately again will bring tremendous to your life. Incredible. Let's go back. So say when we say this over in the name of his forefathers. So what what does this mean? Let's go back for just a second. Remember how do we get into this? Because we're talking about the fat on top of the cave the fat on top of 45:54 the stomach. So says that ultimately again that fat is permitted. So all of the that is on the right is one of the stomachs. So ultimately again so says this comes to include the the fat that is on top of the intestines says 46:24 no it comes to include the is on top of the stomach or I the says the on the just like that's on top of The carrot ultimately say carum means it has like a membrane but it could also be peeled back. 46:49 So too this comes to include any other fat that ultimately again has a membrane and also can be peeled back. Says right says like this just like just like the fat that covers the carob drapes over it has a membrane and can be peeled back. 47:12 Okay. Incredible. Ultimately again, this is the ruling of the Mishna. This is the Mishna puts it forward. But why not go ahead and reverse the previous ruling in order to make it alignment? Why would you go ahead and upend the previous one? Go ahead and instead change around the latter one. It's different. Ultimately 47:42 again since the use that indicates that this is the more authoritative version if that's the case ultimately said the name of of his forefathers but he himself ultimately again did not go ahead and pass in that way. Okay. 48:04 website. So if you notice now what we've done over here is we've transitioned a little bit to a bit a bit of a different topic. So remember again our topic now is stomach preparation right that's what we're talking about over here the just kind of went ahead and just veered off a little bit for a discussion about which is permitted which is not permitted and 48:26 again this does get a little bit confusing because again the the fat on top of certain stomachs is going to be permitted and other stomachs is going to be prohibited kind of just launched into that a little bit we're going to continue on this detour for just another few moments Omar Rav said. 48:46 Okay. So we'll say so Rav makes a very interesting statement over here. So he says means permitted fatim has the ability to plug up perforations versus cannot plug up perforations. Take a look at Rashi for just a moment. It's almost right across says over here So apparently, interestingly enough, 49:16 different type of has different type of properties. So apparently actually sticks. It's stickier and therefore if there's a profession say in the intestines the could go ahead and plug it off. However does not have the ability to go ahead and plug anything up. For example, again he says so over certain stomachs which is the 49:40 not allowed to eat doesn't have the ability to plug up says no not true all has the same stickiness and therefore has the ability to attach itself adhere itself and and and therefore again plugs up any holes. 49:56 What about the again remember again what is the status of the totally right says on one hand are we saying that right we made a definitive statement which means has the ability to plug up plug up a perforation. So is it any and therefore again even the ultimately again it's 50:21 still kosher or maybe not maybe because we know we happen to know in other words is this in the quality of the or the status of is it just that any that's by definition has the ability to plug up a perforation in which case the of would work or no it's actually a din ultimately again it's actually a den in stickiness and 50:46 ultimately again is not as sticky says once it's permitted for consumption by definition by definition apparently it does not have the stickiness quality so again seems to indicate that the stickiness quality is directly related to consumption interesting we'll stop over for today great run great run we're pretty much caught up pretty much right on target everyone. 51:18 Tomorrow we'll catch up. Another incredible day. All right. Have a great day everyone. Mazdir now. I was in here for a whole >> I think if we ask how does that come very well then it's correct >> also we're much more you see from the run with blisters we 28 52:15 my
Expand transcript 7,201 words